The Judiciary Committee of Parliament has justified the number of Supreme Court justices that the President has appointed.
The Minority in Parliament expressed worry that the Supreme Court’s expansion from 11 to 14 justices would deplete state funds, contradicting the president’s assertion that he was safeguarding the public purse.
Yet after a three-day trip to the Judiciary Service, the committee’s chairman, Alhassan Abdallah Iddi, told Citi News that a constitutional review is necessary to restrict the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.
“Look at the number of cases the Supreme Court hears. Almost every case comes to the Supreme Court holding all other variables constant. Many times, people are not satisfied at the Court of Appeal level. They definitely want to go to the Supreme Court. For us to have a cap as others call it, I think that better will it be for a constitutional review to reduce the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. I think that those who cry for the number of judges to the supreme court should look at it very well. It is tied to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.”
Read Also: organ trafficking plot nigerian politician and wife guilty
The Ghana Bar Association thinks it’s time to put a limit on how many Supreme Court justices Ghana can have at once.
Speaking to Citi News on the matter, the Public Relations Officer of the Association, Saviour Kudze, said “the way our constitution is now, if we don’t put a ceiling on it, it will not help us.”
For the limit to the number of judges possibly put in place, Mr. Kudze said, “it will depend on the work at hand.”
“Many more cases are going on appeal now and the Supreme Court happens to be the highest and final appellate court, so for me, going forward, we need to look at it and see if you can have some ceiling.”
“It cannot be left just like that,” he concluded.
SOURCE: Citinews
