Sabine Zetteler remains unconvinced about the value of artificial intelligence (AI). The owner of a London-based communications agency states, “Why would I read something someone couldn’t be bothered to write?” This sentiment reflects her belief in the importance of genuine human creativity.
Zetteler, who employs around 10 staff, questions the point of using AI-generated content, whether it’s reading bot-written articles or listening to AI-created music. “Where’s the joy or personal fulfillment in that?” she asks.
Since the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, AI tools have surged in popularity, attracting over five billion monthly visits. However, the energy consumption required to train and run these systems raises concerns. A Goldman Sachs report noted that a single ChatGPT query consumes nearly ten times the electricity of a Google search.
Florence Achery, owner of Yoga Retreats & More, shares similar reservations. She believes AI is “soulless” and contradicts her business, which emphasizes human connection. Achery is also alarmed by the environmental impact of data centers powering AI technology.
ICYMT: Pastor Mensa Otabil Dedicates Exalted Temple, Warns Against Idolizing Pastors
While Zetteler acknowledges AI’s potential for social good, particularly for the visually impaired, she worries about its broader societal implications. She questions whether success should be measured solely by profit margins or by contributions to society.
Sierra Hansen, a public affairs professional in Seattle, refuses to use AI, citing concerns that it undermines problem-solving skills. “Our brains are meant to organize our days, not depend on AI for scheduling,” she asserts.
However, not everyone can afford to opt out of AI. Jackie Adams, a digital marketer, initially resisted due to environmental concerns but ultimately adopted AI after her colleagues began using it for tasks like copywriting. “I realized that resisting would hurt my career,” she explains. Now, she sees AI as a tool that can enhance her work.
James Brusseau, a philosophy professor at Pace University, believes the opportunity to resist AI is slipping away. He notes that while certain decisions will still require human judgment, many roles will increasingly rely on AI.
Adams accepts that AI is now integral to her work, but she feels a sense of loss about its growing influence. “It seems like we have no control; it’s snowballing,” she laments.
SOURCE: BBC
